Saturday, March 18, 2006

You decide:

So when arguing feminism and someone's not listening to you and then says something like this:

If the truth of what you say is so clear, it shouldn't be difficult to convince me, who is, in many ways, already on your side.


Do you think it's a valid arguement? Or annoying as fuck and patently false?

8 comments:

  1. Anonymous18/3/06 20:52

    What is this in reference to?

    (hey, by the way -- you did know I was kidding when I greeted you as Canadian Clown Dyke, right? I thought it sounded hilarious.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous18/3/06 22:20

    Context!

    (violet: that's funny... only she's still just a wannabe Canadian)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Violet, see my response. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Feminism, more aptly an arguement about sexism in Titus and Lysistrata.

    I thought it was a bullshit statement no matter how you said it, but you can read the whole thing, it's linked in my "for fuck's sake" post down further.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous20/3/06 08:55

    I'm going with 'annoying as fuck and patently false'. I think it;s that damn 'moral highground' bullshit again.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous20/3/06 16:33

    Every liberal troll I've had has used this phrase.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You must get all the post modernists then.

    This guy I know posted that after saying that I was being unreasonable and getting angry at his bullshit sexism.

    Gar. Post modernists need to get their heads removed from their asses every once in a while.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I can finally post to your blog! whoohoo!

    its' a ridiculous, specious logical fallacy. (Phallacy? hehee).

    Just because person A agrees with you on B and C, doesn't mean that if he doesn't agree with E, that E is false.

    He is confusing truth and agreement.

    absurd.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.